North Carolina Ports: A Brief History
In the colonial period, North Carolina’s ports emerged as crucial sites in the growing maritime trade network of the American colonies. These ports of entry served as pivotal hubs where vessels underwent inspection, import fees were collected, and commerce thrived. They were instrumental in facilitating trade with other colonies and foreign nations. Beginning with the settlement of permanent residents in the area north of Albemarle Sound, the colonial authorities, initially under the governance of the Lords Proprietors, recognized the strategic importance of establishing efficient maritime infrastructure. The Lords Proprietors intended to establish three port towns in Albemarle County in 1676, specifically on Roanoke Island, Perquimans, and an area between the Roanoke and Chowan Rivers. However, the actual establishment of these towns varied from the initial plan, with most ships entering or leaving the colony primarily passing through Roanoke Inlet. Despite the variations in their importance, five official ports of entry developed during the colonial period, each serving as regional British-American customs collection districts with unique characteristics and economic importance.
Port Bath, established as North Carolina's inaugural port of entry and located in the town of Bath along a Pamlico River tributary, served as a primary gateway for ships navigating through the Ocracoke Inlet. Despite its relatively smaller size, Port Bath played a pivotal role in North Carolina’s maritime commerce, facilitating the exchange of goods such as rum, sugar, and lumber.
Port Beaufort, positioned strategically near Cape Lookout, managed maritime traffic through Topsail Inlet, known today as Beaufort Inlet. This port became synonymous with the export of naval stores (i.e. tar, pitch, and turpentine), lumber, and provisions, especially corn amongst other things. And frequently suffered from the presence of Spanish privateers.
Port Brunswick played a crucial role as a gateway for commerce in the Cape Fear River basin area. Its port collector's office was situated in the town of Brunswick, below Wilmington, the first permanent European settlement on the lower Cape Fear River. The port facilitated trade in a wide array of commodities, including agricultural products, naval stores, and manufactured goods.
Port Currituck, established to serve commerce through Currituck Inlet, faced significant navigational obstacles due to inlet shoaling. Despite its limited functionality, Port Currituck symbolized the ambitious efforts of colonial authorities to expand maritime trade along North Carolina’s coast.
Port Roanoke, though serving most of the Albemarle settlement, had its collector’s office located in Edenton, reflecting the administrative complexities of colonial port operations. This port, while facing challenges such as shifting inlet channels, remained integral to the economic life of the region.
*Additional material can be found in this collection for the following ports: Port Edenton, Port Elizabeth City, Port Swansborough, and Port Wilmington as well as several folders with material from unidentified ports.
Early ports like Currituck, Roanoke, Edenton, Bath, Beaufort, Brunswick, and Wilmington were key entry points for enslaved Africans and people trafficked from other colonies. These records, though sparse, provide glimpses into the reality of slavery at that time, with reference to enslaved individuals arriving from places like Jamaica, Barbados, Charleston and many other colonies. Some names of enslaved persons can been found in the Port Brunswick records and more evidence of trans-atlantic trafficking can be found across many Port Roanoke account books [Port Brunswick: Vessels Entered," 1787-1789, SR_204_40_011, SR_204_40_012, SR_204_40_040; Port Roanoke: Account of Duties on Imports, Accounts of Imports," 1784-1787, SR_204_40_033]. While details about their lives post-arrival are limited, these accounts are critical for understanding the human impact behind North Carolina's colonial trade economy.
Over time, the significance and geographic locations of North Carolina’s Ports shifted in response to changing economic and environmental conditions. With the advent of the early nineteenth century, the closure of Roanoke and Currituck Inlets led to increased reliance on Ocracoke Inlet for maritime transportation. Even with the absence of Port Currituck, the office of the collector for Port Roanoke in Edenton continued to experience substantial business activity.
Despite the transition from maritime to land-based transportation modes, North Carolina persisted in its efforts to upgrade and sustain its ports. In the early twentieth century, efforts to develop a state port facility were initiated, culminating in the establishment of the North Carolina State Ports Authority in 1945. State port infrastructure was constructed in Wilmington and Morehead City, serving as essential assets for maritime trade. Additionally, inland intermodal terminals were established to enhance connectivity between ports and mainland markets.
While these records offer a comprehensive glimpse into the maritime operations of the time, it is important to note that they are not without limitations. Many decades of port activity remain unaccounted for. Gaps in the historical record mean significant portions of port activity, especially regarding the trafficking of enslaved persons, remain undocumented. Existing documents are predominantly from the latter part of the 18th century, with sparse representation from the late 17th and early 18th centuries, mainly from Port Roanoke.
Despite these gaps, the Port records present a wealth of information for scholars and enthusiasts interested in maritime history and the early commerce of North Carolina. They provide detailed insights into individual ships, their owners, captains, destinations, ports of landing, cargoes, and other relevant subjects. Even for those familiar with existing literature on North Carolina's maritime history, the Port Records offer new perspectives, revealing a diverse array of trading routes, mercantile practices, and traded commodities.
North Carolina Ports: A Brief History
In the colonial period, North Carolina’s ports emerged as crucial sites in the growing maritime trade network of the American colonies. These ports of entry served as pivotal hubs where vessels underwent inspection, import fees were collected, and commerce thrived. They were instrumental in facilitating trade with other colonies and foreign nations. Beginning with the settlement of permanent residents in the area north of Albemarle Sound, the colonial authorities, initially under the governance of the Lords Proprietors, recognized the strategic importance of establishing efficient maritime infrastructure. The Lords Proprietors intended to establish three port towns in Albemarle County in 1676, specifically on Roanoke Island, Perquimans, and an area between the Roanoke and Chowan Rivers. However, the actual establishment of these towns varied from the initial plan, with most ships entering or leaving the colony primarily passing through Roanoke Inlet. Despite the variations in their importance, five official ports of entry developed during the colonial period, each serving as regional British-American customs collection districts with unique characteristics and economic importance.
Port Bath, established as North Carolina's inaugural port of entry and located in the town of Bath along a Pamlico River tributary, served as a primary gateway for ships navigating through the Ocracoke Inlet. Despite its relatively smaller size, Port Bath played a pivotal role in North Carolina’s maritime commerce, facilitating the exchange of goods such as rum, sugar, and lumber.
Port Beaufort, positioned strategically near Cape Lookout, managed maritime traffic through Topsail Inlet, known today as Beaufort Inlet. This port became synonymous with the export of naval stores (i.e. tar, pitch, and turpentine), lumber, and provisions, especially corn amongst other things. And frequently suffered from the presence of Spanish privateers.
Port Brunswick played a crucial role as a gateway for commerce in the Cape Fear River basin area. Its port collector's office was situated in the town of Brunswick, below Wilmington, the first permanent European settlement on the lower Cape Fear River. The port facilitated trade in a wide array of commodities, including agricultural products, naval stores, and manufactured goods.
Port Currituck, established to serve commerce through Currituck Inlet, faced significant navigational obstacles due to inlet shoaling. Despite its limited functionality, Port Currituck symbolized the ambitious efforts of colonial authorities to expand maritime trade along North Carolina’s coast.
Port Roanoke, though serving most of the Albemarle settlement, had its collector’s office located in Edenton, reflecting the administrative complexities of colonial port operations. This port, while facing challenges such as shifting inlet channels, remained integral to the economic life of the region.
*Additional material can be found in this collection for the following ports: Port Edenton, Port Elizabeth City, Port Swansborough, and Port Wilmington as well as several folders with material from unidentified ports.
Early ports like Currituck, Roanoke, Edenton, Bath, Beaufort, Brunswick, and Wilmington were key entry points for enslaved Africans and people trafficked from other colonies. These records, though sparse, provide glimpses into the reality of slavery at that time, with reference to enslaved individuals arriving from places like Jamaica, Barbados, Charleston and many other colonies. Some names of enslaved persons can been found in the Port Brunswick records and more evidence of trans-atlantic trafficking can be found across many Port Roanoke account books [Port Brunswick: Vessels Entered," 1787-1789, SR_204_40_011, SR_204_40_012, SR_204_40_040; Port Roanoke: Account of Duties on Imports, Accounts of Imports," 1784-1787, SR_204_40_033]. While details about their lives post-arrival are limited, these accounts are critical for understanding the human impact behind North Carolina's colonial trade economy.
Over time, the significance and geographic locations of North Carolina’s Ports shifted in response to changing economic and environmental conditions. With the advent of the early nineteenth century, the closure of Roanoke and Currituck Inlets led to increased reliance on Ocracoke Inlet for maritime transportation. Even with the absence of Port Currituck, the office of the collector for Port Roanoke in Edenton continued to experience substantial business activity.
Despite the transition from maritime to land-based transportation modes, North Carolina persisted in its efforts to upgrade and sustain its ports. In the early twentieth century, efforts to develop a state port facility were initiated, culminating in the establishment of the North Carolina State Ports Authority in 1945. State port infrastructure was constructed in Wilmington and Morehead City, serving as essential assets for maritime trade. Additionally, inland intermodal terminals were established to enhance connectivity between ports and mainland markets.
While these records offer a comprehensive glimpse into the maritime operations of the time, it is important to note that they are not without limitations. Many decades of port activity remain unaccounted for. Gaps in the historical record mean significant portions of port activity, especially regarding the trafficking of enslaved persons, remain undocumented. Existing documents are predominantly from the latter part of the 18th century, with sparse representation from the late 17th and early 18th centuries, mainly from Port Roanoke.
Despite these gaps, the Port records present a wealth of information for scholars and enthusiasts interested in maritime history and the early commerce of North Carolina. They provide detailed insights into individual ships, their owners, captains, destinations, ports of landing, cargoes, and other relevant subjects. Even for those familiar with existing literature on North Carolina's maritime history, the Port Records offer new perspectives, revealing a diverse array of trading routes, mercantile practices, and traded commodities.
For more information on the history of North Carolina ports and their involvement with transatlantic slave trade visit this link.
Waller, Caroline. "International Day of Remembrance of the Victims of Slavery and the Transatlantic Slave Trade." History For All the People, March 25, 2023, https://ncarchives.wpcomstaging.com/2023/03/25/international-day-of-remembrance-of-the-victims-of-slavery-and-the-transatlantic-slave-trade/
The following are links to sources referenced to craft the above summary.
DiNome, William G. "Brunswick Town." NCpedia, 2006, www.ncpedia.org/brunswick-town.
Hookway-Jones, G., and Baylus C. Brooks. "Port Bath." NCpedia, 2015, www.ncpedia.org/ports-bath.
Stick, David, and John Hairr. "Ports and Harbors." NCpedia, 2006, www.ncpedia.org/ports-and-harbors.
Tetterton, Beverly. “Wilmington.” NCPedia, 2006, www.ncpedia.org/wilmington.
"Port Records 1700-1800." North Carolina Office of State Archaeology - Underwater Archaeology Branch, https://archaeology.ncdcr.gov/underwater-archaeology-branch/public-education-and-research/port-records-1700-1800
More Information
For more information on the history of North Carolina ports and their involvement with transatlantic slave trade visit this link.
Waller, Caroline. "International Day of Remembrance of the Victims of Slavery and the Transatlantic Slave Trade." History For All the People, March 25, 2023, https://ncarchives.wpcomstaging.com/2023/03/25/international-day-of-remembrance-of-the-victims-of-slavery-and-the-transatlantic-slave-trade/
The following are links to sources referenced to craft the above summary.
DiNome, William G. "Brunswick Town." NCpedia, 2006, www.ncpedia.org/brunswick-town.
Hookway-Jones, G., and Baylus C. Brooks. "Port Bath." NCpedia, 2015, www.ncpedia.org/ports-bath.
Stick, David, and John Hairr. "Ports and Harbors." NCpedia, 2006, www.ncpedia.org/ports-and-harbors.
Tetterton, Beverly. “Wilmington.” NCPedia, 2006, www.ncpedia.org/wilmington.
"Port Records 1700-1800." North Carolina Office of State Archaeology - Underwater Archaeology Branch, https://archaeology.ncdcr.gov/underwater-archaeology-branch/public-education-and-research/port-records-1700-1800
Related Collection: Revolutionary War Era
The American Revolutionary War, 1775 to 1783, secured the independence of the United States of America from Great Britain and established a constitutional democracy. Following the passage of the Intolerable Acts in June 1774, colonial legislatures selected delegates to meet in Philadelphia to consider the issues the American colonies had with Great Britain's Parliament. North Carolina's Whigs, those who supported independence, formed a provincial congress and selected representatives to be sent to the Continental Congress in September 1774. In April 1775, the Revolutionary War began with the skirmishes at Lexington and Concord, and North Carolina joined the war in May 1775, an event that drove Governor Martin out of office and out of the country.